If you do what you've always done...
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:22 am
One of my favorite quotes:
"If you do what you've always done, you'll get what you've always gotten"
I see people on here all the time that preach a certain technique and talk about how if anyone was serious about becoming an elite or jumping as high as Bubka they would copy the Petrov model. It is as if coaches and athletes are just dumb for not doing things like Bubka and anything else is working backwards.
However there was a point where Bubka was not the world record holder. Did people look at him and Petrov like they were idiots for trying a technique that was different than the current world record? I do not think so, but I was not there, and I have a feeling if they did Petrov would not have cared and would have still done what he felt was best.
The point I am getting to is that the Petrov model is really good, it works great, Bubka jumped really high. But Petrov has coached a lot of other men since Bubka and none have come close to being as dominate as him. So you can say it was his technique and not his athletic ability that made him the best, and hey, maybe it was! But I do not think any coaches or athletes should be discredited for trying something different.
If you truly believe that the evolution of the vault is over, then why try? If the Petrov model is truly the end of the line and not studying it is just stupidity, then the only way the world record is going to be broken is by someone that is as athletic as Bubka or close to it that performs the same technique better than Bubka, or by having someone perform the same technique as Bubka but is more athletic than Bubka.
I personally do not think Bubka is the most athletic guy to pole vault. I think he is very high on the list, but not the top of it. What made his technique great was that he was able to jump so much higher than everyone else because he perfected his craft. So I will never blame someone that knows they are not anywhere as fast as Bubka that wants to attempt to become a great pole vaulter by trying something different.
"If you do what you've always done, you'll get what you've always gotten"
I see people on here all the time that preach a certain technique and talk about how if anyone was serious about becoming an elite or jumping as high as Bubka they would copy the Petrov model. It is as if coaches and athletes are just dumb for not doing things like Bubka and anything else is working backwards.
However there was a point where Bubka was not the world record holder. Did people look at him and Petrov like they were idiots for trying a technique that was different than the current world record? I do not think so, but I was not there, and I have a feeling if they did Petrov would not have cared and would have still done what he felt was best.
The point I am getting to is that the Petrov model is really good, it works great, Bubka jumped really high. But Petrov has coached a lot of other men since Bubka and none have come close to being as dominate as him. So you can say it was his technique and not his athletic ability that made him the best, and hey, maybe it was! But I do not think any coaches or athletes should be discredited for trying something different.
If you truly believe that the evolution of the vault is over, then why try? If the Petrov model is truly the end of the line and not studying it is just stupidity, then the only way the world record is going to be broken is by someone that is as athletic as Bubka or close to it that performs the same technique better than Bubka, or by having someone perform the same technique as Bubka but is more athletic than Bubka.
I personally do not think Bubka is the most athletic guy to pole vault. I think he is very high on the list, but not the top of it. What made his technique great was that he was able to jump so much higher than everyone else because he perfected his craft. So I will never blame someone that knows they are not anywhere as fast as Bubka that wants to attempt to become a great pole vaulter by trying something different.