Comparison of the two runways at Sac State

News from the collegiate ranks

Moderators: lonpvh, VaultnGus

User avatar
rainbowgirl28
I'm in Charge
Posts: 30435
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
Lifetime Best: 11'6"
Gender: Female
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
Location: A Temperate Island
Contact:

Comparison of the two runways at Sac State

Unread postby rainbowgirl28 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:25 pm


User avatar
DBH027
PV Nerd
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:30 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, Masters Vaulter, High School Coach, Former College Coach
Location: Chicago, IL

Unread postby DBH027 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:08 pm

I read your post on the SAC State runways, I have to disagree with you....I vaulted there this year and I don't believe the runways are uphill or downhill but are level...the runway towards the infeld is where we jumped and it was well over 125', i was actually amazed at how long it was, most jumpers were using 16 stride approaches around 110' and were barely at the mid-point of the runway...I have to admit, it is the best place I have ever vaulted and I have jumped at some pretty good facilities...it has a great Mondo surface which is extremly fast and on the day we jumped we had a smoking tailwind...I was most impressed with the officials, best I have ever seen...

I am sure this track meets all specs, it was used for the 2004 Olympic trials and I am sure it went through some reviews...

User avatar
DBH027
PV Nerd
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:30 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, Masters Vaulter, High School Coach, Former College Coach
Location: Chicago, IL

Unread postby DBH027 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:16 pm

more info on the track from the SAC State site:

Regarded as one of the fastest surfaces in the country, Hornet Stadium has also hosted the 2001 Junior Olympics, the 2003 NCAA Outdoor Track and Field Championships and the 2004 U.S Track and Field Olympic Trials. The venue will also be the site of the 2005, 2006 and 2007 NCAA Div. I Outdoor Track and Field Championships.

The track has been used by some of the best athletes in the world. Since it was installed in 1999, one world record, six American records, 22 Olympic Trials records, eight U.S. Championship records, two NCAA records, three American junior records and two national high school records have been set at the facility. That list is surely to grow as the NCAA Championship Meet returns to Sacramento State for the next three years.

The stadium track is surfaced with Mondo Sportflex Super X and features eight 1.22 meter-wide lanes on the oval and nine lanes for the 200 and 100 meter races. The track has a 37-meter radius with the steeplechase water jump on the inside of the track on the North curve.

User avatar
rainbowgirl28
I'm in Charge
Posts: 30435
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
Lifetime Best: 11'6"
Gender: Female
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
Location: A Temperate Island
Contact:

Unread postby rainbowgirl28 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:26 pm

DBH027 wrote:the runway towards the infeld is where we jumped and it was well over 125', i was actually amazed at how long it was, most jumpers were using 16 stride approaches around 110' and were barely at the mid-point of the runway...


I don't doubt that runway is well over 125'. It is the outer runway that I wonder about. Most of the guys at NCAAs were near the back of it.

User avatar
banda_b_c
PV Fan
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:45 pm
Location: OKC... to Ark City... to Jonesboro... to Colorado... to Phoenix... and finally Helsinki.
Contact:

Unread postby banda_b_c » Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:13 pm

I am not very good at the polevault but alot of guys on the red pit were unable to get the damned runway figured out in time. The outer runway sucks. In my opinion.
"Badges...? We dont need no stinkin' badges!"-a Mexican Bandit

Vaultref
PV Pro
Posts: 352
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 8:50 pm
Expertise: Master USATF official .. Vertical jumps specialty
Lifetime Best: zero feet

Unread postby Vaultref » Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:45 pm

from a facility spec manual distributed to "officials":

outside runway is 138' (red pit)
inside runway is 147' 8" (blue pit).


We were told (at last years trials) that the entire north end of the track which includes the track, steeplechase portion and the PV area is all flat and the same elevation. Without surveyors equipment, one would have no way to validate that statement.

The tape that was layed out on the inside runway was taken out to about 133'. That put it in front of the box insert on that runway. No one started beyond or on the insert on either pit so I'm told.

User avatar
bjvando
PV Master
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 1:40 am
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, former college coach
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Tim Mack
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Unread postby bjvando » Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:22 pm

would anyone agree with " Numbers never lie"?

I missed the mens prelims, but saw everything else and there was something to notice, and the way becca crunched the numbers certainly shows 'something' that was off there....
Head Coach- Victory Athletics (http://www.victoryathleticspv.com)

User avatar
achtungpv
PV Rock Star
Posts: 2359
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Unread postby achtungpv » Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:32 pm

"There are three types of lies - lies, damn lies, and statistics."

I think you'd need numbers on a lot more meets at the facility to prove there's something going on. And even if the statistics stay the same over 20 meets and there appears to be a pattern. You can survey the facility and what if the slope, cross slope, wind, etc all matched up between the runways and there was no detectable difference between the two? Maybe you could just chalk it up to bad mojo.
"You have some interesting coaching theories that seem to have little potential."

User avatar
rainbowgirl28
I'm in Charge
Posts: 30435
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
Lifetime Best: 11'6"
Gender: Female
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
Location: A Temperate Island
Contact:

Unread postby rainbowgirl28 » Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:24 am

Vaultref wrote:from a facility spec manual distributed to "officials":

outside runway is 138' (red pit)
inside runway is 147' 8" (blue pit).


We were told (at last years trials) that the entire north end of the track which includes the track, steeplechase portion and the PV area is all flat and the same elevation. Without surveyors equipment, one would have no way to validate that statement.

The tape that was layed out on the inside runway was taken out to about 133'. That put it in front of the box insert on that runway. No one started beyond or on the insert on either pit so I'm told.


Eddie Seese says when he questioned USATF about the slope of the runway in the past, he was told that is was level when measured from box to box. Which makes sense. We just won't worry about the uphill and downhill in the middle.

User avatar
SlickVT
PV Follower
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 1:06 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, Post-Collegiate Vaulter, College Coach, High School Coach
Location: Blacksburg VA

Unread postby SlickVT » Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:10 am

Lets blame the war in Iraq on the Sac State runways too... Just kidding...

Come on.

First of all, humans arent perfect, the two runways will never be identical.

Second, even if the runways are a little bit different from each other, its not by much. At least not enough to get in the heads of pole vaulters who should be good enough to not have it affect them.

Finally, I have been told be participating athletes who used both runways that they are exactly the same. It just so happened that more athletes were missing bars on one than the other.
Vertical Technique Pole Vault Club
Blacksburg, Virginia
verticaltechnique.com

VTechVaulter
PV Lover
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 8:00 pm
Expertise: Current Elite Vaulter, College Volunteer Coach, HUGE FAN

Unread postby VTechVaulter » Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:01 am

does anyone have stats like those for the olympic trials... might be interesting to see
Brian Mondschein
Philadelphia Jumps Club, Coach and Co-Founder
www.phillyjumpsclub.com

lonpvh
PV Pro
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 11:56 pm
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Contact:

Unread postby lonpvh » Mon Jun 13, 2005 3:40 pm

I would like to see from the last two Olympic Trials qualifing. The far runway looked like a great runway, everyone was blowing through with clearances with chestblow over the bar, the pit closest to the track was definately uphill longer and most of everyone was coming down short. I saw a bunch of dangerous situations on that pit. I do agree though, typically your better vaulter will be able to clear those lower heights no matter the conditions. The problem I had with it is that it just looked like the other pit just had an advantage. I've done this for a long time and when I saw the set up on Tuesday, I knew it would be a problem. I think it should be looked at. LON

Becca, Its actually 5 no heights for the guys on the red pit for the guys. So it ended up 8 no heights on the red and two on the blue overall.


Return to “Pole Vault - College”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests