I am curious to know what you folks think about the mathematical correlations between different pole lengths. For example, suppose I'm jumping on a relatively stiff 13-160 and gripping near the top of the acceptable weight-rating band (i.e., about 12'6"), and I'm interested in moving up to a 14-foot pole (and maybe trying to move my handgrip up a little...I'm usually vaulting with the standards set at 70-75 cm so I know that I'm penetrating well). Obviously, if I were to stick with a 13-foot pole, my next step would be a 13-165. But what do you all think would be the functional equivalent of a 13-165 in a 14-foot pole (a 14-150? 14-155? or what?)?
Assume that I plan to stick with the same brand (i.e., pole manufacturer) and model. I presume that this would be an entirely different problem if one were to try to change brands and models...so I'd rather not even go there.
In high school (1973-75), we used to figure that 1 foot of pole length equaled about 10 lbs of stiffness on the old black Cata-Poles (so a 14-155 was the functional equivalent of a 15-145) and that correlation seemed to work pretty well back then.
I know that Jan Johnson's website correlates 10 lbs. of stiffness for every 6" (and therefore 20 lbs. for every foot) on today's poles. I've talked with other folks, however, who think that the equivalency is closer to 7.5 lbs. per foot. Since obviously reasonable minds can differ on this question, I assume that this is not a settled issue.
I know that the coaches and vaulters on this site have a great deal of collective wisdom and experience, so I'm interested to know what your experience has been, and if you have formulated any "rules of thumb" for calculating pole equivalencies when moving from one length to the next.
Thanks,
Any Rules of Thumb on Moving to Longer Poles?
Moderator: Barto
Any Rules of Thumb on Moving to Longer Poles?
Russ
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."
-
- PV Master
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 12:42 pm
- Location: illinois
- Contact:
-
- PV Lover
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:31 am
- Expertise: former college vaulter, Current college coach
- Lifetime Best: 5.26
- Favorite Vaulter: bubka
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
- lonestar
- PV Lover
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 12:23 am
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Contact:
I've done some flex testing between 4.90s (16'ers) and 4.60s (15'ers) with the same spans, top support at 14'9 (4.50m) from the bottom of the pole, and found that Jan's chart is pretty accurate assuming 10lbs per 6" and 20lbs per 12". Of course, a lot of it has to do with flex number, ie: are you comparing a medium 13' 160 to a medium 14' 140 or is one of them stiff, one soft. Either way, it's a good rule of thumb that I apply with very few problems to my vaulters on a regular basis.
If I were you, I'd go with a 13'6 155 soft flex to have an easy transition up from your 13' 160, rather than getting a true equivalent which would be a 13'6 150. Unless you plan on gripping above 13'6, no need for the 14'er.
If I were you, I'd go with a 13'6 155 soft flex to have an easy transition up from your 13' 160, rather than getting a true equivalent which would be a 13'6 150. Unless you plan on gripping above 13'6, no need for the 14'er.
Any scientist who can't explain to an eight-year-old what he is doing is a charlatan. K Vonnegut
- Bruce Caldwell
- PV Enthusiast
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 3:19 pm
- Expertise: It is all about Pole Vaulting. I even catch the competitors poles!
- Lifetime Best: 15'8"
- Favorite Vaulter: Kjell Issakson, Jan Johnson
- Location: DFW TEXAS
- Contact:
HERE is another way to compare
I find this a great tool to use!
When moving to the next longer pole
As a rule of thumb here is what I find that works;
[color=green][b]If you have a 14’- 160 pole and are moving to the next length, lets say a 14’6â€Â
When moving to the next longer pole
As a rule of thumb here is what I find that works;
[color=green][b]If you have a 14’- 160 pole and are moving to the next length, lets say a 14’6â€Â
-
- PV Nerd
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:28 pm
- Expertise: Current College Vaulter
- Lifetime Best: 5.38
- Favorite Vaulter: Jeff Hartwig
- Location: Los Angeles (originally from Irvington NY)
- Contact:
I say that you should go with a bigger pole(maby 6 inches) with the same wieght. You will get a stiffer, faster bend if you hold at the same hand grip you are holding at now. This will bring the standerds up a little, and will help you with getting more inverted. In time, with more training, you'll slowly move up the pole.
~Casey
~Casey
-
- PV Lover
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 10:40 am
- Expertise: Pole Specialist, Former College Vaulter, Masters Vaulter, HS Coach, Fan, Parent, College Coach
Up 6" back 5lbs. you SHOULD have the next pole bigger keeping relatively the SAME grip ht. You should NOT jump 6" in grip just because you go to a 6" longer pole............WAY too many variables there. Up 6 back 5 and raise your grip 2 fingers (at most)............... this is NOT accurate when switching brands (at least until there is a STANDARD!!!!) because while the same method is used different wts. are applied based on the "flex".
Call the manufac. of the pole that your on to determine the proper progression.
PUREITY............HEHEHEHE
Call the manufac. of the pole that your on to determine the proper progression.
PUREITY............HEHEHEHE
- rainbowgirl28
- I'm in Charge
- Posts: 30435
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
- Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
- Lifetime Best: 11'6"
- Gender: Female
- World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
- Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
- Location: A Temperate Island
- Contact:
Return to “Pole Vault - Equipment”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests