On the Bryde Bend thread today, volteur raised this idea …
volteur wrote: … to throw another idea out there - i don't think physics is enough to explain pole vaulting (unless we are talking quantum physics). Physics describes our four dimensional world very accurately as Newton did with his Laws, but as we know this idea has been superceded thanks to Einstein's and his theory of relativity. Three physical dimensions (length, breadth, height) plus time. But all this does is explain where the physical bits should be and when.
To go further into what is really going on we need the field of metaphysics, and it is this field i believe Petrov is personally working with. It is also inherent in Agapit's explanation so i feel he is operating from that place as well. Metaphysics takes into account the individual’s intention and how that drives what is occurring on the physical plane.
bit out there! Anyone agree?
Yes – I agree … that it’s a “bit out there!”.
Maybe I don’t understand. I understand "space" and "time", and I understand “vaulter’s intent”. Can you perhaps enlighten me as to how this all ties together, and what Einstein has to do with it?
Maybe you can you provide any of Einstein’s quotes or references on what this means?
I have read the Pole Vault Manifesto diatribe on this topic, so I don’t want my Bryde Bend thread to get off-topic talking about it – thus this new thread.
I hope even in this new thread, we can “keep it civil”.
But I’m interested enough to discuss it – if there’s something substantive to it, and if there’s something that can apply to pole vaulting – even if it’s just a theory.
Thanks!
Kirk