vault3rb0y wrote:Whats more important, transfering more energy through top hand?... or possibly sacrificing that energy transfer by pulling with the bottom hand to speed up the inversion?
Unless i still misunderstand your definition of "pull"... to me a bottom arm pull will redirect your weight to your bottom hand. Essentially you wont be making use of the part of the pole in between your hands, and the transfer of energy would be greatly hindered. I heard the "new" definition of pull, given those exercises of lat pull overs, and to me, doing that sounds like a "row"... please enlighten my slow mind once again .
You've got it a bit backwards. The lat pull is at the start of the swing. It's done in conjunction with the long trail leg swing. Whearas a row is really something that's done later in the vault (but not by 6.05 model vaulters).
In my experience, I didn't really think about pulling (lat pulling). I thought about swinging, and the lat pull happens at the same time. Just like on a high bar. I led with my swing, and the pull followed. Or you could say that they happen simultaneously. But you definitely don't initiate the swing with the lat pull. You just accelerate it by pulling - which is what adds energy to the system.
At some point near the shortest chord, the pole "becomes a highbar" and then your weight is distributed somewhat evenly between your 2 hands. But that's much later than the start of the swing, and by then, your hips are already on their way up.
Really, you're trying to think too hard about transfer of energy between the top and bottom arms. Just think about keeping all the pressure of the pole on the top arm, and use the bottom one for balance.
IMHO, if you do it right, you really don't have to think about pulling with the bottom hand at all - it should just come naturally from all your high bar work.
Kirk Bryde