mowad1 wrote:Are you also forgetting that in the USA we identify talent in gymnastics and basketball, to name a couple, at a very young age?
Where is this taking place and how? I haven't seen it. From what I've heard of the eastern european system, kids were tested in a variety of athletic skills and directed towards sports which they showed the most potential for, not tested for a specific sport.
You don't need great coaches at an early age, just good ones which I think we have.
Been to many junior high meets lately? It's a miracle if half of them don't land in the box, and the ones that make the pit are picking up so many bad habits that they have a career of more unlearning and reprogramming ahead of them than they do refining technique.
A mandatory coaching certification program may be good, but are there no bad coaches in the state of Washington?
I'm sure there are, but unfortunately education is not a failsafe. There are lots of educated dumbasses in the world. Still, even if only 1 out of 10 coaches who took a certification clinic benefitted from it, that's one more reduced chance of a catastrophic injury occurring and increased chance of vaulter success happening.
Jeff Hartwig may or may not have been better if he had jumped 6.00 earlier but he is still the American record holder with more meets over 19' than any active vaulter.
Absolutely, his career, however late it may have taken off, has been an extraordinarily successful one.
I think that it worked out as good as it could have for him.
We'll never know, but how many other emerging elites will fall through the cracks because they don't have the resources available to them that Jeff had, and they're not good enough at a young enough age to secure a sponsor to afford to train?